Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z4's 79.8 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the newer 11 version while Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, so it gives some nice extra features and increased performance. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto Z4.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better looking screen than Moto Z4, because it has a little better screen density, a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy S20 FE has a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy S20 FE also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better processing unit than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features greater battery life than Moto Z4, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity. The Moto Z4 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto Z4 also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy S20 FE costs a little more money than Moto Z4, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.