Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is better than the Xperia XZ3's 79.6 global score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a newer device, and it's also a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xperia XZ3.
Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better processing unit than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory. Xperia XZ3 has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel count in each screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a slightly better camera than Sony Xperia XZ3, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with way less megapixels, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor and a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low light environments.
Galaxy S20 FE has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features improved battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 FE not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.