Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a 90.8 score against 77.8. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's body is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is a lot thicker and was released 4 years before.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a larger display and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy S20 FE has a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera in the back with much more MP. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.