Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than vivo X60 Pro, getting a 90.8 score against 78.8. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Although it's the best device we compare here, Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's design is a little thicker and a bit heavier than the vivo X60 Pro.
Vivo X60 Pro features a screen that's just as good as Galaxy S20 FE's screen, because although the vivo X60 Pro has a bit worse 1080 x 2376 resolution and a quite lower pixels count per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. Vivo X60 Pro features a bit better processor than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Vivo X60 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 48 MP resolution.
Galaxy S20 FE features a greater storage for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit longer battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.