Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is slightly better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, with a 90.8 score against 85.5. Galaxy S20 FE's body is newer and a little bit thinner, but also a little heavier than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's processor is very similar to Galaxy S20 FE's CPU, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, although it has a quite lower pixels density, a little bit worse 1080 x 2246 resolution and a bit smaller display. Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has an external SD slot that supports 744 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE costs more than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.