Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the iPhone 11 Pro, getting a general score of 98 against 84.9. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G works with Android 13 operating system, and iPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system. Even being the best in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also just a little thicker and heavier.
The iPhone 11 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a bit smaller screen, a lot worse 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a little worse pixel amount per inch in the screen. The iPhone 11 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has much more storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3046mAh.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures a lot better pictures and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot more MP camera, a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than the iPhone 11 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.