Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Google Pixel 2, having a 98 score against 81.6. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a much newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 2, but it is extremely heavier and thicker. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a just a bit greater pixel density and a lot larger screen.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much better resolution back-facing camera, a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a way better video resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 2, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.