Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is way better than LG V20's general score of 77. Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot newer than LG V20, it's notably heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more vivid display than LG V20, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a larger display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than LG V20, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better performance than LG V20, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 56 percent larger battery size. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a way higher 108 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V20. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save some money and get the LG V20, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.