Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is newer and a lot thinner, but also way heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Droid Turbo has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a much better video definition and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.