Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 11.65, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 9.8 score. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is a lot newer and way thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it is also way heavier. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots a lot better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution camera. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.