Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Motorola Edge 50, having a score of 98 against 81.2. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Even being the best in this comparison review, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is noticeably older, thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Edge 50.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a little sharper display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a bit smaller display, a bit lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a bit inferior number of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a much smaller sensor, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way better resolution back camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50's battery lifetime is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.