Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 74.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.64 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Neon blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than the Moto G8's 74.4 overall score. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design has the same thickness than Moto G8, but it is heavier. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Moto G8 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Moto G8, because it has much more pixels per screen inch, a bit larger display and a lot higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better storage for games and applications than Moto G8, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with superior battery duration than Moto G8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G8. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G8, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.