Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than the Motorola Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10 version. Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than the Motorola Moto Z4, it is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a greater pixel count per screen inch, a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a little bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much higher video quality and a camera with way more mega-pixels. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than Moto Z4, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.