Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-02-06 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blush gold and Noir black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2510mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 score. Although it's the best phone in this review, we must highlight that it is also a little heavier and a lot thicker. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a sharper display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a little bit bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a higher screen pixel density. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better CPU than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 MP resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola razr (2019), which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.