Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is way better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's score of 79.9. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older, heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Pro.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a processor that's very similar to the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the display and a quite better 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor capturing much worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a camera with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher video definition.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better memory for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit superior battery performance than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.