Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A12, having a global score of 98 against 80.3. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A12, but it's a bit heavier.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A12, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A12, because it has a much higher pixel density, a much higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and video. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A12, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A12 counts with a battery performance that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.