Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 509 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Galaxy A32, with a overall score of 98 against 84.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is older and just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy A32, it's body is still just a bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G comes with Android 13 operating system, while Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better looking display than Galaxy A32, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a little larger display and a lot higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A32's battery duration is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G one.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.