Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A60, with a 98 score against 82.3. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a notably heavier and thicker device than Samsung Galaxy A60. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11 version, so it gives some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A60, because it has a quite higher number of pixels per inch of screen, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite larger display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has much more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy A60, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.