Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is incredibly newer, but way thicker and heavier than the Galaxy C9 Pro. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger screen, a lot better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a higher display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much higher video quality, a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and videos. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has greater battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.