Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Galaxy M30s, with a 98 score against 83.3. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Galaxy M30s has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body has the same thickness than the Galaxy M30s, but it is heavier.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy M30s, because it has a better pixels number per inch of display, a bit larger screen and a better 1440 x 3200px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M30s, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light situations.
The Galaxy M30s has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.