Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy M31's global score of 86.5. These devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M31 has Android 11 version, giving you some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy M31, but it is heavier.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has a quite bigger display, more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy M31, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy M31, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and images, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back and a much better video resolution.
Galaxy M31 counts with better battery life than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 20% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.