Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than Xperia XZ1's 78.3 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is incredibly newer than the Xperia XZ1's, although it's incredibly heavier and thicker. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a little bit better screen density and a really bigger screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better camera than Xperia XZ1, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger aperture for better low light photos and video, a much higher 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ1, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery performance than Xperia XZ1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than the Sony Xperia XZ1, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.