Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than the Xperia XZ2's 79.1 global score. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer and noticeably thinner phone than Xperia XZ2, although it is also heavier. The Sony Xperia XZ2 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a just a little lower pixel number per inch in the display, a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a bit smaller display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better performance than Sony Xperia XZ2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes greater pictures and videos than Xperia XZ2, because it has a way better video resolution, a bigger camera sensor, a back camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3180mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.