Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a 98 score against 78.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11, so it offers some additional features. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is older, heavier and thicker than vivo X60 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a quite larger screen, a better number of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. Both have a 12 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior camera than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and a same size sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back camera with lot more MP and a lot higher video resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with greater battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 19% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.