Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is much better than LG V20's global score of 77. Samsung Galaxy S20's design is way newer and just a little bit lighter, but just a bit thicker than the LG V20. The Galaxy S20 has a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and also faster).
Galaxy S20 counts with a slightly better screen than LG V20, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a little bit bigger screen and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than LG V20, because although it has an external SD slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has improved battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Galaxy S20 has a bit better camera than LG V20, because although it has a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and a way better video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG V20, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.