Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than the LG V30's 79.1 score. Although the Galaxy S20 is noticeably newer than LG V30, it's just a little heavier and just a bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit sharper display than LG V30, because it has a quite larger display, a quite better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a bit greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy S20 features a little bit better memory for apps and games than LG V30, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S20 has just a little better processing power than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S20 counts with longer battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 21 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy S20 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures in low light environments and a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures and a way better video definition.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V30. If you want to save some money, you can buy the LG V30, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.