Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a 94.8 score against 77.9. Galaxy S20 is a noticeably newer device, and it's also noticeably thinner and a bit lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20, although it has a quite smaller display, a quite inferior pixel number per inch of display and a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 9 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy S20 has a little better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.