Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is better than Motorola Edge 50, having a 94.8 score against 81.2. The Samsung Galaxy S20 body has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 50, but it's just a little bit lighter. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has the older 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger display. Galaxy S20 counts with a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM. Motorola Edge 50 has better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also has better video frame rates, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.