Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with a general score of 94.8 against 79.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 is older than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's design is somewhat lighter and a little thinner. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11.
Galaxy S20 and OPPO Find X3 Pro count with very similar processors, both of them have 12 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy S20 has just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution and higher video frame rate.
The Galaxy S20 counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.