Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 566 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the Galaxy A32, getting a 94.8 score against 84.7. The Samsung Galaxy S20 design is thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A32, although it was released about 11 months before. Samsung Galaxy S20 works with Android 13 operating system, and Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and much more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S20 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A32 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 also has faster video frame rate and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy A32 features improved battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.