Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a general score of 94.8 against 81. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro, it's somewhat lighter and also newer. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has the previous 13 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy S20 features a brighter display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a much greater display density and a quite bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro both feature extremely similar batteries. The Galaxy S20 shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.