Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-08-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a global score of 94.8, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M31s's score of 88. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M31s has Android 11 version, providing you a couple additional features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy S20 construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M31s, even though both of them were only released with a few months difference.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a higher number of pixels per screen inch. Galaxy S20 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M31s captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same aperture and a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a camera with lot more mega pixels and faster 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.