Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is much better than the vivo X60 Pro's global score of 78.8. Samsung Galaxy S20 is an older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than vivo X60 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it just a little lighter anyway. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11, so it gives you lots of additional features and better performance.
Vivo X60 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S20. They have a 12 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a better pixels density.
Vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with more memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The vivo X60 Pro has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.