Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is much better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's 85.5 global score. The Galaxy S20 is a newer phone, and it's also a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S20 also has a better 1440 x 3200px resolution and more pixels per display inch. Galaxy S20 captures clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S20 also has a way higher video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a way bigger camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows 744 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1's battery performance is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S20's battery life.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.