Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-01-11 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE has a general score of 89.1, which is much better than the LG V20's 77 global score. Galaxy S21 FE is a extremely newer and a little lighter phone than the LG V20, although it is a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has just a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V20 counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The LG V20 and Galaxy S21 FE have extremely similar cameras, because although the LG V20 has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
LG V20 has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S21 FE features a much better battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG V20, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.