Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-01-11 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a general score of 89.1, which is slightly better than LG V50 ThinQ's overall score of 83.7. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a extremely newer phone, and it's also just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than LG V50 ThinQ.
LG V50 ThinQ has a processing unit that is just as good as Galaxy S21 FE's processing unit, both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. The LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S21 FE features a little longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V50 ThinQ. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy LG V50 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.