Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-01-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Mystic indigo |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a global score of 89.1, which is much better than the Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and lighter than the Moto G Stylus.
The Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit greater display density.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
The Moto G Stylus features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G Stylus also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S21 FE has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Stylus. If you want to save some money, you can get the Moto G Stylus, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.