Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2022-01-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a global score of 89.1, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is notably older and thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still extremely lighter.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a little bit higher display density, a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a larger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S21 FE has a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a back camera with much more mega pixels, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.