Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than Apple iPhone 8's 85 global score. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is much newer than Apple iPhone 8, it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a lot more pixels per inch of screen, a lot bigger display, much more brightness and a much better 1440 x 3088px resolution.
IPhone 8 counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone 8 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the iPhone 8, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.