Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than the Google Pixel 2's general score of 81.6. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is extremely newer, but extremely heavier and somewhat thicker than the Google Pixel 2. Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a way bigger screen, a little bit greater count of pixels in each display inch and a way better 1440 x 3088px resolution. Google Pixel 2 has as much storage capacity to install applications and games as Galaxy S22 Ultra, both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a camera in the back with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution, a way larger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a way higher video quality.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.