Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Google Pixel XL, with a overall score of 95.4 against 81.3. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is extremely newer, but a little thicker and extremely heavier than the Google Pixel XL. Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a better display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The Google Pixel XL's storage capacity to install games and applications is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra one, they have exactly the same internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 45% greater battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior camera than Google Pixel XL, because it has a lot more megapixels back camera, a much higher video quality, a larger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations and a much bigger camera sensor.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs more money than Google Pixel XL, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.