Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the LG V20's general score of 77. Although the Galaxy S22 Ultra is much newer than the LG V20, it is notably heavier and thicker. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better processing unit than LG V20, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a better looking screen than LG V20, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. LG V20 has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot higher resolution back camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V20, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.