Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is notably newer and a lot thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it is way heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a really bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with greater battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a larger aperture for better low light images and videos, a much higher video resolution and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.