Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is way better than Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is noticeably heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's a lot thinner and incredibly newer.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little sharper display than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a much larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos, a back-facing camera with a lot better 108 megapixels resolution and a much better video definition. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with greater battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.