Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Edge 50, having a 95.4 score against 81.2. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a older, a lot heavier and thicker phone than Motorola Edge 50.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 50, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little more pixels per inch in the display, a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a quite brighter display.
Motorola Edge 50 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 and Galaxy S22 Ultra both count with really similar batteries performance. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a bigger camera sensor taking better quality photographs and videos, a lot better video definition and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.