Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Moto Z4, with a 95.4 score against 79.8. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a way newer cellphone than the Moto Z4, although it is much heavier and thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit superior processor than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Moto Z4, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a just a bit more pixels per inch of display and a little larger screen.
Moto Z4 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z4 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures better photographs and videos than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos, a lot higher resolution back camera and a lot better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z4, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.