Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 501 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy A32, having a 95.4 score against 84.7. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra works with Android 13 operating system, and Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer and a little bit thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy A32, although it's also somewhat heavier.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better display than Galaxy A32, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little larger display and a way better pixels number per display inch.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back camera with way more megapixels and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. The Galaxy A32 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a battery duration that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.