Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A60's global score of 82.3. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11, so it provides lots of additional features. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is a lot newer, but thicker and a lot heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A60.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features an incredibly better display than Galaxy A60, because it has a just a little better pixels count in each display inch, a quite bigger display and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A60's storage capacity to store more apps and games is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra one, they have exactly the same internal storage. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels, a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.