Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is better than the Galaxy A8 Star's 82.1 overall score. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is notably newer than the Galaxy A8 Star's, but it's somewhat heavier and thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little bigger screen, a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A8 Star counts with a better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.