Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy A80, getting a 95.4 score against 84.9. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner, but a little bit heavier than Galaxy A80. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A80. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little bigger display and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a much bigger sensor, a much higher video resolution, a larger aperture for better low light photos and video and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as the Galaxy S22 Ultra, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.